Blocklist Removal Center
Contacts  |  Official Statements  |  FAQs  |  News Blog   
Bookmark and Share Popular Myths About Spamhaus

Category: Report
Updated: 2020-06-08
Statement Ref: S013

Blocklist Help

Blocked? To check, get info and resolve listings go to
Blocklist Removal Center

Associated Documents

How Blocklists Work
Legal Questions
Spammers love to make up myths about Spamhaus. Ever since Spamhaus began tracking spammers in the late 1990's spammers have attempted to circulate myths and disinformation about us by posting "astounding revelations" and "shocking truths about Spamhaus" to public forums.

Frequently spammers post anonymous complaints on internet forums which invariably claim we are criminals, racketeers, blackmailers, wanted fugitives, tax-evaders, money-launderers, felons or terrorists, or all of the above. On multiple occasions spammers masquerading as 'freedom activists' have attempted to hijack public sympathy by claiming we are part of a global conspiracy to 'limit Internet Freedom' (they mean their freedom to spam and scam internet users).

The following are some of the more common myths spammers love to circulate about Spamhaus.

Myth: "Spamhaus is a criminal and terrorist organisation"
    For over 20 years spammers have routinely claimed that Spamhaus is a criminal organization, with claims ranging wildly from the CEO of Spamhaus being a "wanted criminal on the run", our staff being convicted criminals, our organization being linked with Al-Queda, and other such nonsense.

    In reality, were any Spamhaus staff to have any type of criminal association or record whatsoever, let alone be "wanted" by any government, Spamhaus would not be a member of International Law Enforcement work groups such as UCENET: UCENET Member Organizations, nor would Spamhaus receive awards from Law Enforcement Agencies such as FBI NCFTA:

    Likewise, were we to have any connection whatsoever to cybercrime or terrorism the FBI would not publicly declare a partnership with Spamhaus such as at:

Myth: "Spamhaus take bribes to remove blocklistings"
    The Spamhaus Project is a self-financed organization that has no external income whatsoever. There is no way for anyone to make payments to the Spamhaus Project, there is no "Donations" button on our site or bank account anyone can send anything to.

    We occasionally hear of spammers bragging to other spammers to have paid Spamhaus for removal of their records, but no spammer has ever been able to show any evidence of doing so.

    The notion that Spamhaus can be bribed to remove records is a myth propagated in the bars of bulk mailing events after a few too many Red Bulls and vodka. The obvious response of the intelligent listener should be "You have evidence of this? Send it to the press!".

    (Note: Any demand by anyone for payment to remove any listings from any Spamhaus database is always a fraud or scam)

Myth: "Spamhaus commits Blackmail and Extortion"
    Spamhaus's SBL Blocklist lists not only IPs directly sending spam, but importantly also CIDR ranges assigned to spammers and spam operations. Spammers naturally do not like this, and neither do some small 'spam-friendly' hosts whose business models (such as "cheap instant signup with 100 IPs" and lack of proactive abuse controls) attract snowshoe spammers.

    Spamhaus SBL Policy additionally allows the SBL to escalate a listing further in cases of serious chronic spammer infection or persistent cybercrime hosting. No different to a Restaurant denying access to a patron not respecting the dress code, this policy effectively states that Spamhaus will not recommend to SBL Users the acceptance of electronic communications from such listed IPs or CIDR ranges while the host continues to allow a spam operation to operate from them. This policy makes it difficult for hosts who would otherwise carry on hosting serious spam operations to continue doing so if they also want to communicate with SBL Users.

    Because the net effect of this policy applies pressure on them to cease abuse, spammers and some spam hosts call this policy "Blackmail" or "Extortion" in an attempt to misrepresent SBL Policy as being "illegal".
    (Both blackmail and extortion are criminal offences. Spamhaus strongly recommends that all criminal acts always be reported to the Police.)

Myth: "Spamhaus is a censorship organization"
    Spammers claim that by blocklisting their spam and websites selling spamware, Spamhaus 'censors' their adverts/scams/pitches. Spammers further claim that Spamhaus ROKSO policy, which lists on the Spamhaus SBL any IP addresses and domains belonging to known ROKSO spammers, means we additionally censor 'non-spamming content' belonging to the spammer. In reality Spamhaus has no interest whatsoever in the content of web sites (unless the content is selling spam services or distributing spamware/malware), we only list such IP addresses because they are under the control of known spammers and any IP under the control of a known spammer is a threat to Spamhaus users.

Myth: "Spamhaus blocklisted Wikileaks"
    Never happened. This myth was circulated by a Russian malware hosting gang known as "Heihachi" in 2010 and further propagated by a blocklisted Dutch cybercrime host known as 'Cyberbunker/CB3ROB' who attempted to trick members of the hacktivist group Anonymous into attacking Spamhaus on his behalf. Quite the contrary, in December 2010 Spamhaus had contacted Wikileaks to warn them that a Russian malware gang was trying to trick Wikileaks readers into visiting a fake 'Wikileaks' mirror in Russia on which the gang was hosting trojan malware poised to infect anyone who visited. In fact the same russian IP that was hosting was also hosting the rest of the crime gang's sites:
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    • =
    The Spamhaus malware warning report concerning this is here.

Myth: "The Russian Government has declared that Spamhaus is an illegal organization"
    Never happened. Russian spammers love to spread this myth, especially in responses to Russian ISPs who disconnect them. Occasionally a naive Russian ISP believes the myth and quotes it back to us confirming that stupidity is not limited to spammers.

Myth: "Spamhaus blocks whole ISPs because of one spam"
    There has never been a case in the history of Spamhaus where an ISP has been blocklisted because of one spam, nor even a small amount of spam. To reach the point of listing an entire ISP on the Spamhaus Block List requires a very serious volume of unchecked spamming or chronic spammer or cybercriminal hosting infestation. The listing of a whole ISP's netblocks can only occur where an ISP has gone 'rogue' and is overrun with spammers, has intentionally ignored all reports and listing warnings from Spamhaus and is intentionally providing a "Spam Support Service" for profit. It is extremely rare for any legitimate ISP to reach that point and usually only occurs with very small Eastern European and Asian ISPs in financial difficulty. Most cases where Spamhaus blocklists "whole ISPs" is where the 'ISP' involved is actually the spam gang simply pretending to be an 'ISP' and has no customers except for spammers.

Myth: "Spamhaus claims to be a non-profit to evade taxes"
    The Spamhaus Project is a non-profit corporation. Non-profit very simply means the company is structured not to make money for shareholders but to fulfil a mission. In Europe, any and all income earned by a non-profit company must be accounted for in annual accounts and standard corporation tax on profits applies. In Europe a non-profit status can not in any way be used to evade taxes.

Myth: "Spamhaus claims to be a non-profit but they make lots of profit"
    This myth speculates that there must be undeclared income flowing into The Spamhaus Project non-profit company, deriving from services sold by a third-party commercial company of which Spamhaus founder is a major shareholder. The myth's logic of why a for-profit commercial company would want to pass its profits not to its shareholders but to a non-profit company which is neither a parent nor subsidiary, and which thus becomes new taxable income for the non-profit, escapes us.

    The unexciting reality is that The Spamhaus Project has no such profits flow, no income, no sales, no customers, and no desire to be involved in commerce. Our focus is entirely on fighting spam. Over a decade ago The Spamhaus Project chose to leave all commercial endeavours (such as commercial Datafeed Services) to 3rd party Strategic Partners such as SpamTEQ, to enable The Spamhaus Project to concentrate solely on fighting spam. Details of The Spamhaus Project's Strategic Partnerships are published here.

Myth: "Spamhaus gets information by hacking servers"
    Spamhaus does not even test for open-email-relays, let alone any other form of computer trespass. We do not do 'penetration testing', or test for server vulnerabilities, or do any other sort of "hacking." Our systems watch for overt, publicly accessible indications of spam and spam support, all things which can be publicly verified.

Myth: "Spamhaus wants to stop spam so that they can control the 'spam industry' for themselves"
    The myth that we are secretly spammers just out to eliminate our competition, is one of the oldest myths and almost too silly to dispel. Spammers often are just not wired in a way where they can understand that life is not all about greed and making money by annoying others. They do not realize that there are people on the internet who work to keep it usable for the world. Spamhaus works to stop spam so that email can remain the powerful communication medium it has become.

Statements Index

Fraudulent fake DNSBL uncovered: Protected Sky (

Fraudulent fake DNSBL uncovered:

EMarketersAmerica vs. The Spamhaus Project

Popular Myths About Spamhaus

Case Answer: e360Insight vs. The Spamhaus Project

TRO Answer: e360Insight vs. The Spamhaus Project

Case Dismissed: Ames & McGee v The Spamhaus Project

Spamhaus IPv6 Blocklists Strategy Statement

Report on the criminal 'Rock Phish' domains registered at

DDoS and Virus Attacks on Spamhaus

Spamhaus Position on CAN-SPAM Act of 2003

Copyright © 2021 The Spamhaus Project SLU. Reproduction from "Popular Myths About Spamhaus" is permitted provided you quote the source as "The Spamhaus Project" and provide a link to the source url:
© 1998-2021 The Spamhaus Project SLU. All rights reserved.
Legal  |  Privacy